AeromarineTaxPros.com: Hook Up With The Tax Pros At The Beginning

When Michael Thibodeau contacted the Californiaalternate exemption. But in the middle of the filing
Board of Equalization (BOE) in search of advice, heprocess, the lead counsel for the BOE changed one of
thought he was taking a prudent action, one that wouldthe definitions of a legal concept that's integral to that
ascertain whether he could bring a recently acquiredparticular exemption," says Alston. "I had dozens of
aircraft into the Golden State before the 90-daycases that were based on the original definition, so I
waiting period was up--and still qualify for a use taxargued against the change of interpretation. But the
exemption. Thibodeau never dreamt that the adviceBOE attorney declared that the definition had always
he got would lead to a ruinous tax bill.been that way."
"Michael was a typical victim of a relationship that isThe definition used by the BOE attorney alluded to the
often very adversarial," explains Tom Alston, Presidentnotion that aircraft of certain types are not designed to
of Aero & Marine Tax Professionals, a Sacramento,fly. "According to the attorney, we could not support
CA-based consultancy that specializes in advisingthat the Citation was designed, or designated, to fly
purchasers of aircraft and marine vessels on statewas because Michael did not fulfill the qualifications for
sales and use tax exemptions. "People like Michael,'first functional use' before the aircraft enters the
and even attorneys, CPAs and financial planners, oftenstate," explains Alston. "The BOE attorney was altering
learn hard lessons when it comes to defendingthe definition of 'first functional use,' which up to that
themselves against the perspectives and findings ofmoment has always meant 'the purpose for which the
the BOE--even though they are seeking legitimateaircraft was designed.' Aircraft are designed to fly;
exemptions that are designed as incentives totherefore, the minute that you flew one, you met the
promote California business."definition of first functional use. It's been that way for
Thibodeau, a 30-year veteran pilot-for-hire and aviation30-40 years. But, with the stroke of his pen, the
management consultant, handled the acquisition of aattorney decides, 'Nope, we've never done it that way.'
1981 Citation CE-550 for three California-basedWhat he said is that any aircraft that has jet engines
corporations in March of 2000. Possession of theor turbine engines or more than 6 seats wasn't
aircraft took place in Reno, NV. In order to qualify fordesigned to fly, it was designed to 'carry passengers.'
the California state use tax exemption, which wouldSo, Thibodeau found himself in a double bind where,
amount to $177,000, the aircraft was delivered in Reno,not only did he get undocumented advice from the
and would be based there.BOE, but the agency was altering the meaning of a
Throughout the due diligence and transactioncritical requirement. It seemed to him that, even though
processes, Thibodeau addressed all questionsexemptions were created to foster business in
concerning California use tax, the exemption and otherCalifornia--an intention that was indeed being
matters to the same official at the BOE's Consumerserved--the BOE was going for the throat.
Use Section. "I thought it would be advantageous toFortunately, Thibodeau indeed had a passenger on
talk with the same person, that it would establish aboard when he flew the Citation into Sacramento,
relationship so that we wouldn't have to start from"officially making first functional use" as far as
scratch...," he explains. "Of course, I had read the BOECalifornia was concerned. "This was a very fortunate
regulations concerning the sale and exemption ... But itcoincidence," Alston says. "Lots of pilots, maybe most
was my first transaction of this type, and I wanted toof them, might not have a passenger on a trip to a
make sure that I verified all matters concerning themaintenance facility. But since there was a passenger
BOE--and that I got it from the horse's mouth."on board, we were able to secure the exemption."
It was then that the nightmare began. After hearingAlston adds that, as fortunate as the case turned, the
from a friend that it might be permissible to bring theCitation owners were lucky. He says that the time to
Citation into California for the sole purpose ofget a tax specialist involved is early in the deal, before
service--without disrupting the use tax exemptionthe transaction is completed.
situation--Thibodeau decided to call his usual contact at"Hiring someone early means we can guarantee
the BOE.results, because we can control the situation" Alston
"My only intention was to get the service work at thesays. "However, once the transaction is complete and
Sacramento facility over with," he says. The threesome complication comes into play, we can't always
new owners, who employed a "substantial number" ofguarantee the results. And that may very well cost
California workers, made frequent business trips tomore because there is less control and more work. In
western Canada, Mexico and throughout the westernshort, our clients can save a lot on fees if they get us
U.S.involved at the very beginning, and they may well save
The BOE official told Thibodeau that it was permissibletheir skins if the BOE is involved."
to bring the aircraft into California and still qualify for theMichael Thibodeau now realizes that there is more to
exemption, as long as the trip was for service only.the tax exemption business than he thought. "I went to
However, after doing so, when he filed for thethe wrong source when I went to the BOE," he says. "I
exemption at the end of 90 days, the sale was held todid what the BOE expert told me to do, but he was
be taxable.wrong,. The next time I will talk to Tom Alston before I
"... I was told by my contact that he did not recall theeven get started on a deal.... I don't feel that the BOE is
conversation regarding the service trip to Sacramento.the kinder, gentler group of people to do business with.
I eventually talked to his supervisor, who told me that IFortunately, I now have the gorillas I need to go up
had no proof of my conversations with the official, thatagainst them."
I had nothing in writing. So here I am, trying to do theThe next time could come soon. The owners of the
right thing, to go through the prescribed process, andCitation are considering selling it and buying a newer
now I'm facing a tax bill for $177,000."model. Yet, Thibodeau says he is still smarting from the
Thibodeau then contacted Tom Alston. Highlyexperience. "It was very tough on me. I faced a
experienced in aircraft tax matters concerningdevastating tax bill. Also, I had to let the owners know
California's BOE, Alston felt sure that Thibodeauabout the situation, and it could have made me appear
qualified for an exemption, but that it was a differentincompetent. These are companies that I've had
one.business relationships with since 1990. Which shows
"So, we eventually filed the tax return, taking theyou that there was even more than $177,000 at stake.