Socio-Technical Systems and Organizational Values

Modern organizations define themselves using2004).STS Applied OrganizationallyA recent Internet
statements of vision. They state their vision in terms ofsearch found the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration
human resources and technology, a socio-technicalLogistic Center's statement of beliefs and
view. Modern organizations also define themselves incommitments. Not all cited here; however, these
terms of values. New employees entering theselected ones reinforce concepts of socio-technical
organization learn the value system from employeessystems.- Results Oriented - The Logistics Center
with longevity in it. How organizations incorporateconstantly drives for results and success. We drive
socio-technical systems as a reinforcement tool ofissues to closure, persist despite obstacles and
their value system is the focus of this paper.ValuesInopposition, and maintain a high energy level. Our
business, small and large, values determine course theemployees readily put in the needed time and effort to
business sets for itself. Yukl (2006) defines values asachieve results.- Innovation - The future of the
key statements of an organization. The valueLogistics Center is assured only as long as it
statement is ideological, what the organizationwelcomes and rewards innovation, creativity, and
considers important. Many values find their way intoresourcefulness. We recognize "trial and error" as
organizations including customer service, innovation,being elements of innovation and continuous
satisfaction of internal and external constituents, andimprovement. Innovation has been the cause of
excellence. Yulk's view of values suggests somethingsuccess for the Logistics Center.- Quality - We
deeper. Organizational values and value creation areprovide the best quality in all of our products and
the soul of competitive edge, competitive advantage.Hillservices. Our goal is to exceed industry benchmarks.-
and Jones (1998) write of management values asPeople - People are our most important resource. We
statements of how managers will conduct themselvesrespect the individual's dignity and value their
and how they will do business. Managers in highcontributions. We invest in training and education to
performing businesses conduct themselves withgive our employees the tools to make the Logistics
stakeholders in mind. Winston (2002) suggests thatCenter a world-class organization.- Teamwork and
high performing leaders accept the values of theCollaboration - The Logistics Center provides a positive
organization as being of higher consequence andand challenging environment that supports the
importance.SystemsValues of an organizationachievement of mission goals and fosters team spirit.
(customer service, innovation, satisfaction) imply anWe are partners with our customers, stakeholders,
organization is a system. Senge (1990) tells us thatsuppliers, and are committed to union/management
organizations are organic systems of interconnectedpartnerships.- Integrity and Openness - The Logistics
and interrelated sub-groups. This suggests more thanCenter values trust, sincerity, honesty, and candor in
brick and mortar structures, it suggests organizationsrelationships both personally and organizationally. We
of people, technology, and social interaction.encourage our employees to express ideas, opinions,
Technology, according to Davis (1996), is a "conceptualand thoughts in an honest and genuine manner.-
bridge" between science and economics. This linkCorporate Citizenship - The Logistics Center values a
gives form to how organizations manage. Conversely,positive corporate image and is sensitive to our
Wren (2005) presents the view of technologicalcorporate responsibilities to the community. We
change being disturbing to the social system of anactively participate and support community
organization. Socio-technical systems offer leverage toinvolvement.
dispel the disturbing nature of change.Socio-TechnicalIn post-industrial organizations, STS helps leaders
SystemsLee (2000) explains social of thecreate constructs that are enabling, empowering, in
socio-technical systems as the habitual attitudes ofturn, enabling and empowering accelerates
people. He includes the relationships between peoplecommunication, and learning and knowledge. Within the
with their values and behavioral styles. He alsocontext of knowledge building and knowledge, sharing,
describes it as the formal power structure identifiedSTS, through collaboration, allows work groups'
using traditional organizational charts. However, heflexibility to develop original work patterns and
continues with the aspect of an informal powercompetitive advantage.Leaders Role in STSDavis
structure based on influence and knowledge. The(1996) urges successful leaders to lead as if the future
technical system makes up second part of the dyad.is now. Accomplishing this means seeing the final
This system, according to Lee (2000), is "machinery,product rather than the processes of the product. STS
processes, procedures and a physical arrangement."Aemploys the right people and the right technology at
socio-technical system, abbreviated STS for thethe right time within a structure that supports
remainder of this paper, is people and technologyorganizational values.
blended. Yet, this is a much too simple definition. SomeIn an environment of rapid change, having a
elements of STS are closely interrelated; therefore, it iscompetitive advantage allows organizational foresight.
not easy to distinguished items within a STS as purelyHowever, foresight requires maintaining core values.
technical or purely social. Aldridge (2004) explains STSSocio-technical systems support organizational values
as approaching organizational work groups as socialby maintaining organizational memory and shared
systems and macro social systems. A third level ofexperiences. Memory and shared experiences provide
work observed is primary work systems. The primaryviews of where the organization was while keeping
work system according to Aldridge is one or moreeveryone tracking toward future vision. An
work units involved in face-to-face work. Work unitsorganization with strong STS standards uses their
collaborate jointly and have support of management,technology to preserve history, create performance
relevant technology, resources, and workplacebenchmarks, and develop knowledge and learning
specialists. Aldridge includes the writings of Trist (1981)environments. Strong quality systems demonstrate
when defining macro social systems, "...macro socialteams' abilities to eliminate obsolete practices while
systems include systems in communities and entirestaying within the framework of original
business sectors as well as societal institutions" (Trist,values.ConclusionStated earlier, organizations are
1981, pg. 11). The STS design in work groups issystems of interrelated parts with differing skills and
increasing productivity of the group and increasing jobskill levels. STS, working within an organizations value
satisfaction through optimization of social factors andsystem promotes wisely those with skills, knowledge,
integration with technical factors.Elements ofand ability. Additionally, STS, working with the value
STSAccording to an anonymous article on STS, thesystem, provides workers with the tools needed to
author explains some of the components integratedgrow in the skills, knowledge, and abilities so they, too,
into a functional socio-technical system. Explainedcan be promoted. Members of self-directed teams
separately, each component has its own character;seek new or improved skills from within the STS and
however, it is clear how closely linked each is andthrough their interconnection with team members.
overlaps the others.- Hardware is computers andSelf-directed teams improved productivity and
computing peripherals, the classic technology ofcommitment to the team and organization in English
modern business. Organizations today do not existcoalmines in 1949 and self-directed teams continue
without some kind of computing network, connectingbeing productive and committed. Therefore, an
wires, routers, and individual workstations.- Softwareorganization employing socio-technical systems can
includes operating systems (Windows, UNIX, Apple,grow into the future, yet hold fast to its historical past
etc). As technology advances, it is increasingly difficultand the values making the group viable.References
to separate hardware and software. Software variesAldridge, J. W. (2004). aboutChange Solutions.
based on organizational needs; yet software allowsEncyclopedia of Distributed Learning (ISBN
companies to create data for storage on hardware0-7619-2451-5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
devices. The software often runs from the sameAnonymous, (no date). Why a Social-Technical
hardware devices used for storage. SoftwareSystem? Retrieved online January 12, 2006 from
facilitates social interaction by allowing distantly remoteAnonymous, (1996 - May-June). Maintaining
people an opportunity to message each other inOrganizational Memories. TQM/CCI News. Retrieved
almost real-time.- Physical surroundings (physicalJanuary 22, 2006 from
setting) help establish the social and technical rules ofDavis, S. (1996). Future Perfect. Reading, MA:
engagement. Building with an open floor plan and openAddison-Wesley.
desk arrangement allows open social interactionHill, C. W. L. & Jones, G. R. (1998). Strategic
among workers. Buildings with offices separatingManagement: An Integrated Approach. Boston, MA:
workers reduce interaction. Managers with an innerHoughton Mifflin Company.
sanctum guarded by a secretary's office establish aLee, Q., (2000). Quality in the Balance: Six-Sigma - A
hierarchy of power.- People, by name and by title,Socio-Technical System. Retrieved online January 12,
make up an integral part of any organization culture,2006 from
social environment. Within an organization people haveSenge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The art &
roles they play, positions they work in, and ancillarypractice of the learning organization. New York, NY:
roles they exercise. Within their roles, they use theirCurrency and Doubleday.
surrounds with hardware and software to supportTrist, E. L. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical
their roles.- Procedures define operational proceduressystems: A conceptual framework and an action
in an organization. Procedures are statements of rulesresearch program. Ontario Quality of Working Life
and norms formally written. Outside the formal writtenCenter, Occasional Paper no. 2.
procedural statements are unofficial ties to data flowU. S. Federal Aviation Administration - Logistics Center.
and reporting relationships. Procedures attempt toOrganizational Values. Retrieved online January 22,
define culture in a STS but the informal norms and2006 from
behaviors are equally important to understand whenWinston, B. (2002). Be a Leader for God's Sake.
developing a STS model.- Laws and regulations areVirginia Beach, VA: Regent University, School of
similar to procedures but impose stronger publicLeadership Studies.
sanctions when violated.- Data and data structures inWren, D. A. (2005). The History of Management
STS involve collection and storage of an organization'sThought (5th Ed.) Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons,
information. Additionally, this element explains data use,Inc.
retrieval, or presentation for use.An organization'sWren, J. T. (1995). The Leader's Companion: Insights
socio-technical system supports the business as aon Leadership Through the Ages. New York, NY: The
great place to work. More than that, STS is a keyFree Press.
factor to supporting leadership initiatives, vision, andYukl, G. (2006). Leadership in Organizations (6th ed.).
values. Observed in 1949 in Great Britain, researchersUpper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Paul
developed socio-technical systems in South YorkshireHoffman is a student at Regent University studying
coalmines. They saw the technical improvements intoward a Doctor of Strategic Leadership, holds a MA,
mining coal combined with highly motivated workLeadership and BS, Organizational Communication. He
groups who self-regulated and collaborated closelyis an adjunct at Bellevue University and Metropolitan
became more productive than traditional work groupsCommunity College teaching Leadership, Business
with the same technological improvements. AnotherCommunication, and Speech. Paul is a military veteran
observation was the self-regulated and collaborativeof almost 22 years, has ten years retail management
teams were more cooperative among themselves,experience, and six years academic and teaching
performing multiple tasks rather than one man one job,experience.
and committed to Ortgeist (spirit of the place) (Aldridge,