The History Of Austrian Airlines At Jfk

1. Austrian Airlines’ Origins Alliance whose agreement, without renegotiation, would
Austrian Airline’s genesis can be traced back tohave expired in August of 2000.
March 20, 1918, at which time the Austrian Postal2. Despite an agreed investment limitation of 10%,
Administration had inaugurated daily scheduled mailSwissair had nevertheless attempted to purchase
service from Vienna to Kiew with intermediate stops inadditional Austrian Airlines stock, precluding
Krakow, Lwow, and Proskurow, a route whoseAustrian’s goal of autonomous identity and
average stage length had been 250 kilometers. independent ownership and forcing it to withdraw from
When space had permitted, passengers had also beenthe Swissair-led Qualiflyer Alliance of European
carried.  The highly successful, punctual service wascarriers.
later extended from Proskurow to Odessa and from3. Swissair and Sabena had formed a combined
Vienna to Budapest.  However, a flight prohibition,commercial management structure, which again had
implemented at the end of World War I, had resulted inproven contrary to Austrian Airlines’ independent
its termination.direction.
When the ban had finally been lifted, Austria4. In early 2000, both Sabena and Swissair had
subsequently reentered the civil aviation market byconcluded a code-share cooperation agreement with
founding the Oesterreichische Luftverkehrs AGAmerican Airlines, a US airline-alignment counter to
(OELAG) on May 12, 1923 with an initial one millionAustrian Airlines’ US feed strategy.
Crown investment financed by Junkers, a GermanAustrian Airlines, a small, but profitable international
aircraft manufacturer (49 percent), and variouscarrier of considerable quality, had nevertheless
Austrian shareholders (51 percent).  Commencingneeded the reach of a global alliance to remain
scheduled service from Munich to Vienna some twofinancially viable and thus concluded a membership
days later, it had utilized a Junkers F.13, a single-engined,agreement with the Lufthansa- and United-led Star
low-wing monoplane which had featured an enclosedAlliance, which had become effective on March 26,
cockpit and passenger cabin and had rested on a tail2000.  Still the largest and longest-running alliance, it
wheel.  OELAG eventually operated several versionshad then been comprised of Air Canada, Air New
of this rugged, but (then) modern design, and increasingZealand, All Nippon, Ansett Australia, Austrian Airlines,
demand had soon necessitated larger aircraft, the firstBritish Midland, Lauda Air, Lufthansa, Mexicana, SAS,
of which had been a higher-capacity, tri-enginedThai Airways International, Tyrolean, United, and Varig,
Junkers G.24 delivered in 1927 and the second ofand had collectively carried 23-percent of the
which had been the more advanced G.31, delivered theworld’s passenger traffic.  At the same time, the
following year.  Perhaps the ultimate design had beendecision had permitted continued independent identity
the Junkers Ju.52/3m, a tri-engined, 18-passengerand autonomous operation, yet expansion potential for
airliner with a gross weight of 24,000 pounds and aboth the airline and its Vienna hub.  Expressed as a
cruise speed in excess of 150 mph, which had joinedsentiment, the decision could be stated as, “Here
the fleet in 1936.  Most major East and Westwe grow again!”
European flag carriers had also operated the type atThe transition from the Atlantic Excellence to the Star
this time. Alliance, having commenced as early as January 2000,
By the following year, OELAG’s route system hadhad entailed four integral changes:
radiated to Athens, Belgrade, Berlin, London, Paris,1. An entirely new IT (information technology) system
Prague, Rome, and Zurich, in addition to incorporatingand frequent flier program.
several Austrian domestic destinations, with much of2. The operational relocation to a new terminal,
the service daily.  It eventually became the fourthpassenger service office, passenger check-in counter,
largest European carrier after Lufthansa, KLM, and Airload control-aircraft dispatch center, and gate at JFK.
France, with 975,840 weekly seat-kilometers. 3. New alliance airline code-share flights and traffic
Coincident with OELAG’s growth had been thefeed had resulted in the closing of the Atlanta station
completion of five Austrian airports--namely, Graz,and the subsequent opening of the Chicago and
Innsbruck, Klagenfurt, Salzburg, and Vienna.reopening of the Washington stations in the US.
When Austria had been absorbed into the Third Reich4. The company-wide migration training in Oberlaa,
in 1938, OELAG had been incorporated into DeutscheAustria.
Luft Hansa (DLH).  Nevertheless, it had flown 120,000Star Alliance membership, once again entailing a
passengers 7.5 million kilometers without fatality duringrelocation to Terminal One at JFK, had prompted
its reign. another handling carrier change, from Delta to
2. Initial Growth Lufthansa, which had now performed the Baggage
When World War II had ended, Austria, nowServices and Passenger Check-In functions, while
independent, had signed the Peace Treaty with all fourAustrian itself had continued to act in the capacities of
occupying powers in 1955, and had once again soughtArrivals, Ticketing, Load Control, Ramp Supervision, and
to enter the civil aviation field by forming a flagManagement.  Under a reciprocal agreement, it had
carrier.  Two such national airlines were actuallyalso provided these passenger services to Lufthansa
proposed: Air Austria, formed by the Austrianfor its own Frankfurt departures during non-operational
People’s Party and capitalized by KLM and laterhours.  Aircraft loading and baggage room functions
Fred Olsen, a Norwegian charter company, andhad been provided by Hudson General, which had later
Austrian Airways, formed by the Austrian Socialistbeen renamed GlobeGround North America.
Party and financially supported by SAS.  Neither everIn a further cost-reduction strategy, Austrian Airlines
flew and the two were eventually combined onhad relocated to a smaller, lower-rent Passenger
September 30, 1957 to form an integrated companyService office on the ground floor of Terminal One in
with an initial AUS 60 million investment which adopted,September 2002, at which time the Load Control
Phoenix-like, its pre-war name of OesterreichischeRamp Supervision function had been awarded to
Luftverkehrs AG, but whose English equivalent ofLufthansa.  No longer serving Lufthansa’s flights,
“Austrian Airlines” had now been used.  Thethe Austrian staff had been further reduced to six
airline had thus been born.full-time and two part-time positions and the daily shift
Ownership had encompassed Austrian privatehours had decreased from nine to eight.
investors, at 42 percent; public enterprises, at 28Austrian’s largest-capacity aircraft, the
percent; SAS, at 15 percent; and Fred Olsen, at 15A-340-300--accommodating 30 business class and
percent.  Austrian inaugurated scheduled service on261 economy class passengers--had intermittently also
March 31, 1958 after a 20-year suspension with fourprovided service to JFK, particularly during the summer
leased Vickers V.779 Viscounts, a medium-capacity,2002 timetable when a late Saturday departure had
four-engined turboprop airliner designed in Great Britainbeen scheduled.  Two such aircraft had then been in
and initially deployed over the Vienna-Zurich-Londonthe fleet:
route.  Austrian had finally returned to the sky.1. OE-LAK
Growth proceeded rapidly and, in 1960, it took delivery2. OE-LAL 
of the first of four larger-capacity, stretched Vickers9. Swissport USA 
V.837 Viscounts, which it inaugurated into service onThe consistent thrust to reduce costs had resulted in
May 23, and the following year it received the Vickersyet another handling-company change at JFK on
V.845 Viscount for slightly lower-capacity routes. January 1, 2003, when most of the ground services
Both British turboprops provided reliable, economicalhad been transferred from Lufthansa to Swissport
service, the V.837 not being retired until 1971.  TheUSA.
Douglas DC-3, the best-selling civil airliner of all time,In preparation for the change, the Swissport passenger
had also been acquired at this time and had enabledservice staff had attended the Guide Check-In course
Austrian to inaugurate domestic services on May 1,in Vienna in December 2002, while one Swissport
1963, a route which would later be served by Austrianagent, who had structured the Baggage Services
Air Services.  This aircraft was replaced by the moredepartment, had attended the World Tracer Basic
advanced, larger-capacity, turboprop-powered Hawkercourse in October of the following year.
Siddeley HS.748-2 in 1966, another British design.Outfitted in Austrian Airlines uniforms, the Swissport
Austrian Airlines entered the jet age on February 20,staff had performed the Arrivals, Lost-and-Found,
1963 when it inaugurated the first of five Sud-AviationPassenger Check-In, Departure Gate, Load Control,
SE.210-VIR Caravelle twin-jets into service and set theand Ramp Supervision functions, while Austrian itself
stage for its eventual strategy of operating short- tohad continued to provide Ticket Sales, Administration,
medium-range, low- to medium-capacity, t-tailedSupervision, and Management services.  Load control,
twin-jets on a predominantly European (and later Northwhich had initially been performed in Terminal 4 using
African and Middle Eastern) route structure. the Swissair DCS system, had been transferred to
Designed in France, the Caravelle was quiet, cruisedTerminal One and the Lufthansa-WAB system after
above the weather, and reduced flying times betweenthe Swissport operations personnel had completed a
European capitals, and had, in fact, been the firstcomputerized load control course in Vienna that
design to permit economical, short-range, pure-jetMarch. 
service. 10. North American Station Training
3. Transatlantic Experiment               Program               
Contrary to most European flag carriers, which hadBecause most of the Swissport agents had had little
operated transatlantic service to the United Stares andprevious airline experience; had been unfamiliar with
Canada with quad-engined DC-4s since World War II,Austrian Airlines’ product and procedures; and had
Austrian Airlines had maintained its medium-range routemostly had only a basic, entry-level Passenger Service
system until April 1, 1969.  It had been at this time thatCourse, I had endeavored to create a local training
it had stretched its wings across the Atlantic with aprogram by drafting the course descriptions, writing the
large-capacity, intercontinental Boeing 707-320,textbooks, devising the quizzes and exams, teaching
registered OE-LBA and chartered from Sabenathe courses themselves, and subsequently issuing the
Belgian World Airways, which had been deployed ontraining certificates in order to more adequately
the Vienna-New York route with an intermediate stopprepare them to perform their functions.
in Brussels.  This so-called “transatlanticThe program, tracing its routes to the Austrian Airlines
experiment,” despite Austrian’s delay inPassenger Handling Course created in 1989 and the
launching it, had ultimately proven both a prematureintroductory Load Control material written in 1998, had
and financially unsound one for two primary reasons:evolved into the full-fledged North American Station
1. The home market had still been too small.Training Program, whose content, updated in
2. Vienna-Schwechat had been insufficientlyaccordance with aircraft, system, procedure, and
developed as a hub, providing few connecting flights toalliance change, had entailed the four integral
which this transatlantic service could transfercurriculums of “Initial Passenger Service,”
passengers.“Ramp Supervision Certification,” “Load
Resultantly, after a two-year trial, the 707 had beenControl Licensing,” and “Airline Management;”
returned to Sabena on March 31, 1971, leaving Austrianand had ultimately encompassed 27 Passenger
once again to concentrate on its primarily continentalService, Ramp Supervision, Load Control, Air Cargo,
route system for which nine short-to medium-range,and Airline Station Management procedural and training
low-capacity McDonnell-Douglas DC-9-30s had beenmanuals; two station histories; 28 curriculums; and 63
ordered.courses taught to Austrian Airlines and Austrian
Similar in overall design to the Caravelle, butAirlines-handling carriers Delta, Lufthansa, Passenger
manufactured in the United States, the t-tailed jetlinerHandling Services/Maca, SAS, Servair, and Swissport
offered a slightly higher passenger capacity, greaterat the eight North American stations of Atlanta,
payload capability, a higher gross weight, moreCancun, Chicago, Montreal, New York, Punta Cana,
powerful engines, and improved economy, and with itToronto, and Washington.
Austrian entered a new era which would span almostThe program, which had quickly become the equivalent
two decades.  It had later described this design asof an “Airline University” and had often been
“the start of something big, classical and stillsited as the reason why Swissport staff had
modern.”  The first DC-9-30 had been delivered oncontinually striven to transfer to the Austrian Airlines
June 19, 1971 and the type soon proved to be theaccount, had often proven instrumental in their career
mainstay of its fleet.path advancements, facilitating their promotions or
In 1974, Austrian leased a McDonnell-Douglasacceptances by other airlines. 
DC-8-63F, registered OE-IBO, from Overseas National11. Boeing and Lauda to JFK 
Airways (ONA) for cargo services to Hong Kong, butJFK, hitherto exclusively served by Austrian Airlines
these were later discontinued.  Other than theand its fleet of A-310, A-330, and A-340 Airbus
707-320, the DC-8-63F was its only otherwidebody aircraft, had received its first regularly
large-capacity, long-range, quad-engined jet.scheduled Lauda Air 767 operation during the summer
So versatile and popular had the DC-9 design provenof 2004, while the frequency had multiplied four-fold by
itself to be, that Austrian later ordered five stretched,the following year.  During 2007, it had altogether
higher-capacity DC-9-50s.  The first of these hadreplaced the 17-year Airbus service.
been delivered on September 14, 1975.Founded in April 1979 by Niki Lauda, of racing car
That these twin-engined aircraft and the discontinuationfame, Lauda Air had acquired Alpair Vienna’s
of its transatlantic service were proper strategies forcharter license for ATS 5 million and had initiated
the Austrian national carrier had been reflected by itscharter and air taxi service in cooperation with Austrian
positive growth.  On June 26, 1974, for example, aAirlines with two Fokker F.27 Friendship turboprops,
new maintenance base had been opened atpredecessors to the Fokker F.50s Austrian Air
Schwechat International Airport-Vienna.  Its value hadServices itself had later operated.  Niki Lauda, born in
also continued to swell: in 1967 its share capital hadVienna, Austria, in 1949, had amassed his wealth as a
increased by AUS 140 million to AUS 290 million.  InFormula I racing driver, having won two world
1969, it had further increased to 390 million.  And inchampion titles and 25 Grand Prix races.  It had
1962 it had reached the one billion mark.  During eachquickly became apparent, however, that two Austrian
of the three years, from 1972 to 1974, it had posted acarriers could not coexist because of fierce
profit.  Its route system had equally expanded: in 1976,competition, downward yield pressure, and an
Austrian had stretched its wings to Cairo in the Middleinadequate local market base, and the F.27s had
East and to Stockholm and Helsinki in Scandinavia.ultimately been leased to Egyptair.
Demand, soon outpacing capacity, had necessitated anSix years later, in January of 1985, two BAC-111-500s,
initial order for eight McDonnell-Douglas DC-9-80s toa British twin-jet not unlike the SE.210 Caravelle in size,
replace its existing DC-9-50s.  Also designated DC-9range, and design, had been leased from Tarom
Super 80, this aircraft had been a more modernizedRomanian Airlines, increasing its fleet capacity to 208
version of the previous –50 series variant forseats, and these had later been deployed on charter
medium-range deployment and featured a furtherand inclusive-tour (IT) services, initially to Greece, but
fuselage stretch for still higher capacity and refanned,later to other European destinations.  Demand
higher-thrust, and more fuel-efficient Pratt and Whitneybecame so high that it had ultimately exceeded
JT8D-209 engines.  Austrian, which shared theavailable capacity and a larger 737-200, leased from
distinction of being launch customer for the design withTransavia Holland, had replaced one of the BAC-111s,
Swissair, inaugurated the first elongated DC-9-81 intowith both types later disposed of upon delivery of two
service on October 26, 1980 on the Vienna-Zurichstill-higher capacity, new technology 737-300s.  These
route with aircraft OE-LDR “Wien.”  Thehad been operated on a steadily growing charter route
twin-jet was later redesignated MD-81 and quicklynetwork.
became the short- to medium-range workhorse of itsIn May 1986, Lauda Air had applied to the Austrian
fleet.Ministry of Transport for a license to operate
New additions to its ever-expanding route systemscheduled international service.  This had been
included Larnaca in 1979; Jeddah, also in 1979; andapproved in November 1987, thus ending Austrian
Tripoli in 1981.Airlines’ long-held monopoly.  A
Another 1980 milestone had been the foundation ofsubsequently-acquired, 235-passenger, dual class
Austrian Air Services (AAS), which would eventuallyBoeing 767-300ER had permitted long-range,
become a wholly-owned subsidiary, to operateintercontinental flights to be inaugurated, the first of
Austrian domestic routes with two 19-passenger,which, on May 7, 1988, had been a weekly scheduled
twin-turboprop Fairchild Swearingen Metro II commuterVienna-Bangkok-Hong Kong service, shortly joined by
aircraft.  The first such service had been operated ona Vienna-Bangkok-Sydney sector.  Filling the need for
April 1.lower-fare, long-haul, leisure-oriented travel, Lauda Air
Austrian plied smooth skies.  Indeed, its 1980 balancegrew rapidly.  In 1985, for instance, it had carried
sheet had indicated a AUS 71.5 million net profit, its95,768 passengers and had flown 2,522 flight hours
tenth consecutive one.with 67 employees, while in the first ten months of
The MD-81, intemittently proving itself to be as optimally1987, it had carried 236,730 passengers and had
suited to its route system as the twin-jet SE.210-VIR,undertaken 5,364 flight hours with 169 employees, a
the DC-9-30, and the DC-9-50 had been, was followed147-percent passenger increase.  By 1990, its fleet
by its shorter-fuselage derivative, the MD-87, whichhad swelled to five aircraft, comprised of three
Austrian ordered on December 19, 1984 for146-passenger 737-300s and two 235-passenger
lower-capacity route sectors, and the Austrian Air767-300ERs, which had been deployed on charter
Services fleet was equally upgraded with the additionservices to European destinations such as Spain and
of two 50-passenger Fokker F.50 twin-turbopropsGreece, Middle Eastern destinations like Israel, and to
which were ordered on September 25 of the followingAfrica and the Far East, and on scheduled services to
year. Vienna, Bangkok, Hong Kong, and Sydney.
4. Transatlantic Return Earning its license for European scheduled service on
Operating a modern, fuel-efficient fleet over anAugust 23, 1990 for the first time, a right thus far only
expanding route system and carrying almost 1.5 millionheld by incumbent Austrian Airlines, it had commenced
passengers in 1986, Austrian once again contemplatedservice from Vienna to London-Gatwick with five
intercontinental service, now both to New York in theweekly 737-300 flights.
west and to Tokyo in the east, and toward this end itSeeking entry into the Austrian market,
had converted its previous order for twoLufthansa-German Airlines had announced a marketing
medium-range Airbus Industrie A-310-200s to thecooperation with Lauda Air in July 1992, sealing this
long-range A-310-300 version on June 25, 1986. alliance the following January with a 26.5-percent
Austrian had signed the original memorandum ofcapital increase, shortly after which the two carriers
understanding for the A-310-200s as far back as Aprilhad inaugurated a quad-weekly 767-300ER service to
18, 1979, a date which was to prove a full decadeLos Angeles.
before the service would actually get off the ground. Well aware of competition from Austrian Airlines on
Three factors could be cited as to why the time mayinter-European routes from its limited Vienna market,
have been ripe for a relaunching of this service:Lauda had sought to inaugurate its own service with
1. In the 15-year interval since the last intercontinentalsmall-capacity, 50-passenger, twin-engined Canadair
service had been terminated, the home market hadRegional Jets, ordering six of the type in October 1993,
considerably grown, a fact demonstrated by thewhich had been deployed on routes to Barcelona,
prevailing increases in nonstop US-Vienna service,Madrid, Brussels, Geneva, Manchester, and Stockholm
provided by Pan Am, Royal Jordanian, and Taromwith the start of the summer timetable on March 27,
from New York, and by American from Chicago.1994.  Singapore, which had replaced Bangkok in
2. Its route structure in general equally offeredNovember of that year, had become the new
excellent connections to West European, North“bridge” between Vienna and Sydney
African, and Middle Eastern destinations.Melbourne, and the weekly 767 service had been
3. The A-310 had thus enabled long, thin routes such asdoubled.
Lyon-New York with Air France, Frankfurt-NewarkOn March 26, 1995, Lauda Air had established a
with Lufthansa, Istanbul-New York with THY, and Newsecond European hub, Milan-Malpensa, in cooperation
York-Stockholm with Pan Am to have been served.with Lufthansa, which now held a 39.7-percent stake in
The decision to reinstate intercontinental service,the fledgling Austrian carrier, basing three of the six
scheduled for the spring of 1989, had officially beenoriginally-ordered CRJ-100s there. These had been
made two years earlier, on June 25, 1987, and woulddeployed to Vienna, Manchester, Brussels, Paris,
be operated by two Pratt and Whitney-poweredBarcelona, and Dublin.  The Candair Regional Jets,
A-310-300s which would serve the Vienna-New Yorkalong with an increasing number of 737s, had provided
and Vienna-Moscow-Tokyo routes, the latter inthe backbone of its European fleet.
cooperation with Aeroflot and ANA All-NipponIt had soon become apparent that pending European
Airways.  These services had been predicted toderegulation would not likely tolerate dozen-aircraft
have depended upon the connecting passenger forairlines unless they had served very small, specific
profitability.  On the New York route, for example, amarket niches.  Lauda Air had been unable to survive
66-percent, break-even load factor had been neededin the face of competition from Austrian Airlines once
during the first year of operation, primarily comprised ofbefore.  Both had operated medium- and long-range,
US-originating, Austria-originating, and connectingtwin-engine aircraft from bases in Vienna and had
passengers.  Both routes had relied on the lucrative,offered considerable passenger service quality.  An
high-yield, frequent business traveler who had beenultimate cooperation with Austrian Airlines seemed
unable to take advantage of the lower, restrictedinevitable.  This had been partially consummated in
fares.  Austrian Airlines would offer a first class cabinJune 1996, at which time Austrian Airlines and Lauda
on its A-310-300s for the first time in its history.Air had operated single-aircraft, dual-code flights to
The first aircraft, registered OE-LAA “NewNice, Milan, and Rome with the regional jet for the first
York,” had been delivered on December 22, 1988,time.  On March 12, 1997, this had been expanded,
and the second, OE-LAB “Tokyo,” had followedwith the announcement of a strategic, tri-carrier
in January.  The aircraft had constituted theAustrian/Lauda/Lufthansa cooperation, Austrian Airlines
airline’s first widebody, twin-aisle type.now taking a 36-percent stake in its former competitor
Austrian had returned to the transatlantic US marketwith Lauda himself retaining 30 percent and Lufthansa
on Easter Sunday, March 26, 1989, when two smoke20 percent.
puffs had signaled the touchdown of the red-white-redOn September 24 of that year, Lauda Air took
liveried widebody twin-jet, configured for 12 first class,delivery of its second wide body aircraft type, the
37 business class, and 123 economy class passengers,777-200, which had been inaugurated into service on
at JFK amid warm spring weather.  After a briefthe Vienna-Singapore-Sydney-Melbourne route on
turn-around, the aircraft, operating as Flight OS 502October 1, replacing the venerable 767.
and piloted by Captain Braeuer and First OfficerOn September 21, 1999, now one of the three integral
Kutzenberger, had been tug-maneuvered away from“Austrian Airlines Group” members along with
the gate at 1900 with 121 passengers, who would beAustrian Airlines itself and Tyrolean Airways, Lauda Air
served by nine cabin attendants, and took off into thehad announced its intention to join the Star Alliance,
deep purple dusk at a take off weight of 153,603 kilos,which became effective on March 26, 2000.
40,300 of which had been fuel required for the AtlanticAs the lower-cost arm within the three-airline group,
crossing.  The flight had been 18 years in the making.Lauda Air had provided medium- and long-range
Airport, reservations, sales, and marketing staff hadscheduled and charter service on leisure-oriented
subsequently gathered in the Icelandair Saga Loungeroutes with a four-type, 22-aircraft fleet, maintaining its
used by its business class passengers for aown brand identity.  In 2004, however, the first steps
celebratory drink and a group photograph.toward integration with the Austrian Airlines brand had
The Tokyo route had been opened in the summer andoccurred with the ratification of a joint Austrian-Lauda
the A-310, to become Austrian’s intercontinentalAir cockpit crew contract, and in January of 2005,
widebody, had served it for more than a decade,aircraft OE-LAE had become the first of four
operating to multiple US, African, and Far Eastern767-300s to have been repainted in the Austrian
destinations with four aircraft in a final two-class seatAirlines livery, featuring the new interior color scheme
configuration registered as follows:and a 24-business class and 230-economy class
1. OE-LAApassenger configuration.  Lauda Air itself had
2. OE-LABreverted entirely to a single-class, high-density charter
3. OE-LACcarrier within the Austrian Airlines Group with a narrow
4. OE-LADbody fleet of Boeing 737s and Airbus A-320s.
By the summer of 1989, Austrian Airlines had servedThe summer 2004 Lauda 767 flight, which had
54 cities in 36 countries in the United States, Westernoperated as an addition to the daily Austrian frequency
Europe, Eastern Europe, North Africa, the Middle East,during the 11-week period from June 26 to September
and Japan with a total route length of 100,3585, had arrived at 2055 on Saturday evenings and
unduplicated kilometers. These services had beendeparted some 25 hours later on Sunday at 2200.  In
operated by 26 aircraft comprised of the Fokker F.50,order to prepare the station for the additional service,
the McDonnell-Douglas MD-81/82/83/87, and the Airbuslocal Boeing 767 Passenger Service and Boeing 767
A-310-300 whose average age had then been fourLoad Control courses had been created and taught to
years and had been describable as follows:the Swissport staff.  Because Lufthansa had not
1. Airbus A-310-300: A long-range, medium-capacity,been licensed on 767 aircraft, maintenance had been
wide-body, twin-aisle, twin-engine jet airliner--Austriancontracted to Delta Air Lines, which had operated all
Airlines’ intercontinental jet.  Austrian Airlines hadthree -200, -300, and -400 series 767s, and an
dubbed it an “intercontinental European.”extensive night stop and security procedure had been
2. McDonnell-Douglas MD-81: A medium-range,performed before aircraft push-back to the Terminal
medium-capacity, narrow-body, single-aisle, twin-engineOne hardstand, at which time security seals had been
jet airliner--Austrian Airline’s European, Northapplied to all access doors.  The inbound galley
African, and Middle Eastern workhorse.  Austrianequipment had been offloaded and washed and
Airlines had described it as a “universal medium-haulprepared for the following evening. 
airliner and the mainstay of its fleet.”The late departure had proven difficult to sell in the
3. McDonnell-Douglas MD-82: The carrier had orderedbusiness cabin without considerable marketing
the variant “for special-duty scheduled and charterpromotion and fare reduction because of the
services.”aircraft’s then 36-passenger Amadeus Class
4. McDonnell-Douglas MD-87: The short-fuselaged,capacity.  Due to the size of its aft, lower-deck door,
lower-capacity version had been “tailor-made to itscargo-pallet loading had been restricted to four
needs in capacity and range.”positions in the forward compartment.  The aircraft
5. Fokker F.50: A short- and regional-range,themselves had operated in a combination of Lauda
low-capacity, narrow-body, single-aisle, twin-engineAir and Star Alliance liveries.
turboprop airliner operated by Austrian Airline’sDuring the summer 2005 timetable, the 767-300 had
Austrian Air Services subsidiary on domestic andoperated up to four additional weekly frequencies
select long, thin international routes.  Austrian Airlinesfrom June 14 to September 2, resulting in 11 weekly
had considered it “a propjet specialist indepartures from JFK, with the A-330 standardly
city-hopping.”operating the early service and the 767-300 operating
In addition to Austrian Air Services, Austrian Airlinesthe late flight.
owned 80 percent of Austrian Air Transport (AAT),In 2007, the type had altogether replaced the A-330
which operated worldwide charter and inclusive tourand A-340 fleet. 
(IT) flights with both Austrian Airlines and Austrian Air12. Centralized Load Control 
Services aircraft, having carried 506,000 passengers inIn late-2006, a concept known as the “Centralized
1988.  It also maintained a close marketing agreementLoad Control” (CLC) System had been
with Tyrolean Airways which operated services fromimplemented at JFK, and the station, like the nucleus of
Innsbruck with 37-passenger de Havilland of Canadaan atom, had become the core of it all.
DHC-8-100s and 50-passenger DHC-7-100s.Brainchild of Michael Steinbuegl, JFK Station Manager,
5. JFK Station Evolution the procedure, following trends set by Swiss
Initial training, held at Austrian Airlines’ NorthInternational in New York, Lufthansa in Cape Town,
American headquarters in Whitestone, New York, andand SAS in Bangkok, had its origins in an earlier
taught by Peter "Luigi" Huebner, commenced oninvestigative project in which he had explored cost
February 6, 1989, or some six weeks before thereductions by means of a large, single Centralized
inaugural flight, and had included the “PassengerLoad Control department in Vienna or several regional
Handling I” and “Adios Check-In” courses.ones, although the latter inherently carried language and
Austrian Airlines’ first JFK location, the East Wingtime zone obstacles.  Michael, former Aircraft
of the no-longer-existent International Arrivals Building,Handling Manager, had amassed considerable
had shared facilities with Icelandair, including fiveexperience creating operational procedures and
Austrian-specific check-in counters and the jointly-usedmethods, central to which had been weight and
Icelandair Saga Lounge, the former equipped withbalance.
computers, automated boarding pass printers, andSeeking to apply this knowledge and simultaneously
laser-scannable baggage tag printers.  The groundattempting to rectify the system incompatibility and
staff, entirely employed and trained by Austrian andcommunication difficulties encountered with the
outfitted in its uniform, had performed the full spectrumSAS-Bangkok arrangement in Washington, he tackled
of functions: Passenger Service, Ticket Sales,this station first, which, like JFK, already used the
Lost-and-Found, Load Control, Administration,Lufthansa-WAB system.  In the process, he set the
Supervision, and Management.course for the many transitions to come by making
However, the success of the operation relied upon theseveral duty trips to establish local station-compatible
equipment which had serviced it and it had been theprocedures and then drafting a detailed booklet
decision of Airbus Industrie to scale-down its full-sizeconcerning them.  The first centralized load sheet for
A-300 which had resulted in the A-310-300 and hadthe Washington flight, OS 094, occurred on November
made the reinstated transatlantic operation possible. 1, 2006.
Its long-range, twin-engine, wide body design, ofCharlie Schreiner, the head of Austrian Airlines Load
concurrent technology, had offered the same rangeControl, subsequently marked the occasion with the
and twin-aisle comfort to the passenger as thefollowing words:  “With Austrian Airlines Flight OS
comparable quad-engined 747 or the tri-engined DC-10094 on November 1, our first line station had been
or L-1011, yet at the same time had been a quiet,connected to a regular Centralized Load Control
fuel-efficient aircraft with a small enough capacity toprocess with ULD aircraft.  All activities toward the
permit profitable, year-round operations.  The largeroperational flight preparation, load planning, ULD
747, DC-10, or L-1011 would have, because of marketcoordination, and WAB System documentation,
size, been forced to operate at a loss for most of theinclusive of the load sheet transmitted to the cockpit
year except during the peak summer travel season. via ACARs, had been successfully controlled by our
Any of the other then long-range aircraft, inclusive ofJFK station yesterday.  I would like to thank our
the Boeing 707 and the McDonnell-Douglas DC-8, hadcolleagues Mike Steinbuegl and Robert Waldvogel for
featured older-generation, fuel-thirsty, noise-emissive,the professional and excellently organized preparation
four-engined technology of early-1960s design which,of the CLC procedures, as well as the Austrian ladies,
because of newly enforced Stage 2 noiseRegula Munz and Eva Lingeman in Washington and
requirements, would have been banned from USthe handling agents in JFK and Washington (Swissport
operation unless they had been hush-kitted orand SAS Scandinavian Airlines System) in their
altogether engine-retrofitted.  It had been because ofengaging work during this transition.  This good work
the very A-310 that Austrian Airlines and other smallerhad also led to the first flight departing three minutes
European carriers like it had been able to profitablyahead of its scheduled departure time.  I wish all
operate the long, thin Vienna-New York route sector. participants continued success in the CLC process.”
The initial 1989 timetable had offered six weeklyThe remainder of the CLC program, however, involved
frequencies during the summer and five in the winter,phased implementation.  In May of the following year,
at which time two A-310-300s had operated bothservice had been reinaugurated from Chicago. 
transatlantically to New York and to the Far East, viaBecause this could now be considered a “new”
Moscow, to Tokyo.  They alternatively flew thestation, it logically followed that its load sheet would be
longer-range sectors to Tel Aviv, Istanbul, andintegrated into the CLC system from the start and,
Teheran.  During the first six months of JFKdespite computer system differentiations, had been
operations, an aircraft had never experienced ansuccessfully adapted with the first flight on May 29
excessive delay because of aircraft scheduling andafter procedural modifications.
on-time performance had been exemplary.With these cities being handled by JFK, it had been
In-flight service had represented a large portion of andecided to integrate the last North American station,
airline’s expenditure.  As a result, many of theToronto, whose first centralized load sheet had been
carriers had begun to reduce this in order to decreaseissued on July 1.
costs.  Austrian Airlines, however, remained unique inThree Austrian Airlines-dedicated Swissport Load
a world aloft reduced to snacks and paper cups byControllers, two of whom had worked on a given day
providing printed menus, amenity kits, china service,during the peak summer season, had formed the
complimentary alcoholic beverages, and freeCentralized Load Control System team.
earphones in the coach cabin on the Vienna-NewSince the fourth station had been integrated, JFK had
York and New York-Vienna route, a concept whichproduced some 120 load sheets per month, and the
had placed its product at the very top of the quality list.highly successful system had yielded numerous
Because of the size of the A-310, however,benefits.
lower-deck cargo space had been limited, with the1. It had, first and foremost, produced considerable
forward hold usually accommodating the baggage unitsavings.
load devices (ULDs) and the aft hold accommodating2. All flights had departed on time relative to load plan
the cargo itself, which had often been restricted toand load sheet preparation.
two pallets and a single AKE unit.3. All four North American flights had been
There had always been a certain “prestige” tooperationally handled by only one more daily Load
flying to New York.  Although the number of annualController than JFK had had for a single departure.
passengers entering the United States through JFK4. All loading instruction reports and load sheets had
had begun to decline as an increasing number ofbeen generated in the Lufthansa-WAB system.
alternative US gateways had become available, it had5. And Vienna had had immediate access to all load
still been the largest entry point.  New York hadcontrol-related data and documentation.
therefore remained the most logical destination for a13. Boeing 777 
small carrier which had only served a single US city. When Austrian Airlines had turned the page of its
Because JFK had handled 1990 traffic with a (then)winter 2008-2009 timetable on March 29, JFK had
insufficiently sized, outmoded 1950s Internationalfielded its first Boeing 777-200ER operation, the
Arrivals Building facility, the operation often sufferedcarrier’s largest capacity equipment and the fifth
service deteriorations, particularly during peak arrivalbasic type to have served New York after the A-310,
times when it had became very strained, entailingthe A-330, the A-340, and the 767.
delays during taxi and subsequent immigration, luggageThe aircraft, having originally been acquired by Lauda
retrieval, and customs formalities.  The saturated airAir, had been configured for 49 business and 258
traffic conditions stretching from Boston to Washingtoneconomy class passenger, although two later
through which the aircraft had to fly; the subsequentlyexamples, which had featured higher gross weights
dense approach pattern formed by JFK, La Guardia,and modified passenger arrangements, had
and Newark International Airports; and the final difficultyaccommodated 260 economy class passengers in
in obtaining a landing slot equally impacted operations. ten-abreast, three-four-three, configurations.
Passengers had often underestimated the timeDuring the six-month period between April and
required to complete arrival processing after actuallySeptember of 2009, the single flight had carried 34
leaving the aircraft.  It had, however, been thispercent more arriving and departing passengers, along
environment that Austrian Airlines had chosen when itwith significantly increased complements of cargo and
had elected to partake of the “New Yorkmail, than the comparable year-earlier period, when the
experience.” 767 had been deployed.
Although these negative facets of the operation hadThe four 777 registrations had included the following:
sometimes placed it in a poor light, it had, in fact, been1. OE-LPA
JFK’s operations, and not Austrian’s, which had2. OE-LPB
been observed, since all carriers operating into JFK3. OE-LPC
had fallen victim to these ills, and because of them, an4. OE-LPD
extensive renovation and rebuilding project, designated14. Lufthansa Acquisition 
“JFK 2000,” had at this time been launched,2009 had been a pivotal year for Austrian Airlines.  
which would ultimately lead to the construction orBecause of the global economic downturn, escalating
renovation of almost every terminal, new parkingfuel prices, eroding yields, and strong competition within
garages, and an inter-airport light rail system.Western Europe from low cost carriers, its financial
Although New York-Vienna load factors had initiallyviability and therefore continued existence as a
been low, these had steadily increased until the vastcompany had been threatened, despite previously
majority of flights had been full.  Large tour groupsunsuccessful attempts to stem its losses by selling its
had constituted an increasing portion of the passengerA-330 and A-340 fleet, reducing its long-range route
mixture, along with the anticipated connectingsystem, and implementing several restructuring plans. 
passenger, who had been able to take advantage ofIts savior, in the form of an agreement with
the expanding Vienna hub.  It had been the ultimateLufthansa-German Airlines to assume its debt and
testament to a carrier when a passenger had chosenacquire the majority of its shares, had enabled it to
to fly with it and make a connection at its intermediatecontinue operating.
hub as opposed to flying nonstop with a nationalOn August 28, the European Commission had officially
carrier.approved the proposed acquisition of the Austrian
As a “second attempt” across the Atlantic,Airlines Group by Lufthansa-German Airlines,
Austrian Airline’s intercontinental A-310 service tocomprised of the 500 million euro restructuring
New York had ultimately proven successful.assistance from the state holding company and the
With the acquisition of its third A-310-300, registeredmerger between the two carriers, thus paving the way
OE-LAC, Austrian Airlines had striven to serve atoward Austrian Airlines’ integration into the
second US gateway in the spring of 1991 and hadLufthansa Group by September.  In order to achieve
wished to establish a presence on the West Coast,the required antitrust immunity, Lufthansa had agreed
specifically in Los Angeles, but the A-310-300’sto relinquish key flight slots and reduce the number of
11-hour flight duration had precluded this reality. services between Vienna and Brussels, Cologne,
Chicago had been alternatively considered, butFrankfurt, Munich, and Stuttgart.  For Austrian Airlines,
American’s own nonstop Boeing 767-200ERwhich would become one of Lufthansa’s many
service to Vienna from Chicago-O’Hare, where itindependent, European hub carriers, it had signaled
had established its second largest hub, had proven toofinancial survival; an improved economic foundation;
competitive and Washington-Dulles had therefore beencost synergies, such as joint fuel and aircraft
chosen instead.purchasing; and access to Lufthansa’s extensive
For the European continental network, a higher grossinternational sales and route network.  Austrian
weight McDonnell-Douglas MD-83 had been scheduledAirlines’ own niche within this system had entailed
for 1991 delivery and several of the existing MD-81sthe establishment of Vienna as a high-performance
had been slated for conversion to this standard, thushub for traffic feed to its dense Central and Eastern
permitting increased range and/or payload capability. European route system.
Two further Fokker F.50s had also been on order orAs a result of this ownership change, numerous,
option to facilitate increased domestic and long, thinfundamental North American changes had occurred.
international service.In Toronto and Washington, for example, agreements
During the five-year period, from 1989 to 1994, Austrianhad been reached wherein Lufthansa had assumed
Airlines had operated independently at JFK, offering asthe ground operations handling at these stations.
few as four weekly departures during the winter andIn New York, more than half of its Whitestone, North
as many as seven during the summer. American headquarters, employees had been laid off
6. Delta Air Lines Code Share and the location, for almost a quarter of a century its
Changing market conditions had necessitated modified“fortress” located on the fifth floor of Octagon
strategies at JFK.  Seeking to align itself with a USPlaza, had been closed, with the remaining staff
domestic carrier in order to obtain vital “feed” torelocating to Lufthansa’s East Meadow, Long Island,
its transatlantic flights it had been unable to achieve onfacility, and integrating with its staff.
its own, Austrian Airlines had concluded a marketingAt JFK, Austrian Airlines Cargo had relocated to the
agreement with Delta Air Lines in 1994, in which itLufthansa facility on November 1, and 16 days later
would place its two-letter “OS” code onSwissport had passed the ground-handling torch to
Delta-operated flights, while Delta itself wouldLufthansa-German Airlines.
reciprocally place its two-letter “DL” code onMichael Steinbuegl, Manager of that station for four
Austrian’s services.  Two Delta flight attendants, inyears, had been promoted to Key Account Manager,
their own uniforms, had initially also served in the cabinsNorth America, but four Ticket Sales-Reservation
of Austrian’s A-310s to and from Vienna.positions had been rendered redundant when
Although the concept had slowly reaped financialLufthansa had assumed those functions, reducing the
benefit, the aircraft had ultimately achieved high loadAustrian Airlines’ staff to just three members, all of
factors, carrying both Austrian and Delta passengerswhom had received limited, six-month contracts which
from some two dozen US cities through New York tohad expired on May 15, 2010.  They had subsequently
Vienna, often with beyond-travel.been integrated into the Lufthansa operation and
In order to reduce ground-handling costs and attainschedule.
synergistic, inter-carrier benefits, Austrian Airlines hadThe last Austrian Airlines “red presence,”
relocated its operations to Delta Terminal 1A (laterwhether having been created by purely Austrian
redesignated Terminal 2) on July 1, 1994, retaining onlyAirlines or Swissport staff, had occurred on November
nine of its original 21 staff members.  Delta Air Lines,15, and the first floor office in Terminal One, hitherto
the newly-designated ground-handling carrier, had“home” for both the Austrian Airlines and
performed arrivals, lost-and-found, passenger check-in,Swissport Management, Passenger Service,
departure gate, ramp, and baggage room functions,Centralized Load Control, Ticket Sales-Reservations,
while Austrian itself had continued to act within theand Baggage Services/Lost and Found Departments,
ticketing, load control, administration, supervision, andhad been relinquished for three desks in the Lufthansa
management capacities.facility, two of which had been Duty Manager stations
Also in 1994, Austrian had taken delivery of the first oflocated on the main level and one of which had been
two long-range, quad-engined A-340-200s configuredthe Key Account Manager position located on the
for 36 business class and 227 economy classlower level in the Station Operations office.
passengers.  The two aircraft, which wouldAll things seem to come fully cycle.  The event,
periodically serve New York throughout the nexteffectively ending 21 years of autonomous Austrian
decade, appeared with the following registrations:Airlines presence, had marked the carrier’s return
1. OE-LAGto its 1938 integration with Lufthansa and its 2000
2. OE-LAHground-handling arrangement at JFK. 
From February 1997 to February 1998, Austrian also15. JFK Station Strengths 
relocated its check-in counters and operational officeThroughout its 21-year presence at JFK International
to Delta Terminal 3, but otherwise operated within theAirport, Austrian Airlines had handled five aircraft
same marketing framework.types--the Airbus A-310, the Airbus A-330, the Airbus
1997 also marked the first time that the transatlanticA-340, the Boeing 767, and the Boeing 777; had
route to New York had sufficiently matured to supportassumed four strategies--its initial, independent
a second departure on selected days during theoperation; the Delta Air Lines code share agreement;
summer timetable, with the aircraft arriving at 2045the tri-carrier Atlantic Excellence station; and the Star
and redeparting at 2205.  Usually operated by aircraftAlliance integration; had operated from four JFK
OE-LAC, an A-310 with a reduced-capacity business,terminals--Terminal One, Terminal Two, Terminal Three,
but higher-capacity economy class section, the lateand the International Arrivals Building; had been handled
flight had fostered better connections with the middayby three companies--Delta Air Lines,
bank of departures from Vienna. Lufthansa-German Airlines, and Swissport USA; and
7. Atlantic Excellence had used two computer systems.
Once again yielding to airline deregulation-necessitatedBecause the talents and abilities of many of the staff
realignment and endeavoring to further attainhad been channeled to produce creative and
cost-reducing synergies, Austrian Airlines hadinnovative accomplishments during the last chapter of
integrated its JFK operations with Sabena andits existence, JFK had notched up several strengths
Swissair on March 1, 1998 under the Atlanticand successes, some of which had enabled it to play
Excellence Alliance, forming the first tri-carrier station. an increasingly nucleic role within North America. 
Although the employees of the three carriers hadThese achievements can be subdivided as follows:
continued to wear their respective uniforms, they had1. The textbooks and courses had subsequently been
operated from single passenger service and loadused to duplicate this success at Austrian Airlines’
control offices, utilizing a joint Austrian, Sabena, andother North American stations.
Swissair check-in facility, and equally handled each2. The Centralized Load Control (CLC) Department,
other’s flights.  During the peak summer season,entailing the preparation of loading instruction/reports
seven daily departures operated by four airlines hadand load sheets for the four North American stations
been offered.of Chicago, New York, Toronto, and Washington, had
The Atlantic Excellence station had been comprised ofbeen highly successful and had once involved four
eight functions, including Control, Arrivals, Departures,aircraft types: the Boeing 767, the Airbus A-330, the
VIP/Special Services, Ticketing, Load Control, RampAirbus A-340, and the Boeing 777.
Supervision, and Trouble Shooting.  Because Swissair3. Omar himself had often traveled to other stations in
had already been contracted to provideorder to restructure their Baggage Services
Malev-Hungarian Airlines’ load sheet services, theDepartments.
Load Control function itself had entailed handling some4. The Ticket Sales-Reservations counter, under the
six aircraft types, inclusive of the 747, the A-340, thedirection of Sidonie Shields, had consistently collected
MD-11, the A-330, the 767, and the A-310, and thesignificant amounts of annual revenue in ticket sales,
Atlantic Excellence integration had often requiredexcess baggage, and other fees.
inter-carrier training courses.5. The visible presence of Austrian Airlines, in red
As had singularly occurred with Austrian Airlines, Deltauniforms, to the passenger, whether worn by Austrian
had equally concluded reciprocal two-letter code-shareAirlines or Swissport staff.
agreements with Sabena and Swissair, but now took6. The special flights, such as those carrying the Rabbi
the former marketing arrangement to full allianceTwersky group, the American Music Abroad group,
status at Delta’s significantly-maturing Newthe IMTX group, the Vienna Boys’ Choir, the Vienna
York-JFK flight hub.  Delta continued to provide thePhilharmonic Orchestra, and Life Ball, the latter with its
ramp and baggage room functions for all three Atlantichigh-profile celebrities, colorful characters, and
Excellence airlines.predeparture parties.
In August of that year, Austrian had taken delivery of7. The special events, including “The Year in
the first of four longer-range, higher-capacityReview,” the Pennsylvania ski trips, the summer
A-330-200s, registered OE-LAM and configured for 30pool parties, the birthdays, the Thanksgiving dinners,
business and 235 economy class passengers, and theand the Secret Santas at Christmas.
type had ultimately replaced the workhorse A-310-3008. And, finally, the daily briefings, the family atmosphere,
fleet.  The four aircraft, later operating with a reducedthe jokes, the laughs, the raps, and the human
business class capacity of 24 when the Grand Classconnection which had continually emphasized the life
concept had been introduced, had included theforces behind it all.
following registrations:Michael Steinbuegl, who assumed command as JFK
1. OE-LAMStation Manager in September of 2005, had cultivated
2. OE-LANthe environment and orchestrated the steps which had
3. OE-LAOallowed every one of these strengths and
4. OE-LAPaccomplishments to have been made. 
During the summer timetable of 1998, JFK had fielded16. Two Decades of Elasticity 
its first dual-aircraft type operation, with the firstAustrian Airlines, hitherto among the smallest European
departure standardly operated by the A-330 and theairlines, had to assume a considerable degree of
second by the A-310. necessary “elasticity” during its 21 years at JFK,
8. Star Alliance ebbing and flowing in the ever-changing turbulence of
Although an ultimate “Swissport Solution,” underprevailing market conditions, seeking financial benefit,
which all Atlantic Excellence JFK ground staff wouldsynergistic strength, market niche, alliance realignment,
be transferred to the ground-handling company, hadand ultimate change of ownership.  Defying Darwinian
been envisioned, the eventuality had never playedphilosophy, whose “survival of the fittest”
out.  Rumors, rumbling through the station like theprediction is often translated as “survival of the
gentle forewarnings of a pending storm, had pervadedlargest,” Austrian Airlines had, despite numerous,
the atmosphere by mid-1999.  A new strategynecessary redirections, proven the contrary, perhaps
seemed to loom on the horizon and its seeds, plantedprompting a rewording of the philosophy to read,
long before it had bloomed, had been multi-faceted and“survival of the smallest”--to which should be
omni-encompassing.added, “as a global player.”
1. In June of 1999, Delta Air Lines and Air France hadToward this end, the latest strategy had enabled the
formed the fundamental basis of a new global alliance,carrier to survive.  For station JFK and its staff,
later named SkyTeam, thus dissolving the 25-monthhowever, it had not.
Austrian/Delta/Sabena/Swissair Atlantic Excellence