How safe Indian Aviation Industry is? report by FAA

India has been found to be fully compliant with theoperations inspectors on board with DGCA which now
international safety standards by an audit done by theincludes 14 full time Government Flight Operations
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of the UnitedInspectors (FOI) and 18 FOIs on secondment from
States of America. Before permitting a foreign airlineindustry was shown to the FAA team as against the
to operate in the USA, FAA of US, backed by the USprevious of only four FOIs in March 2009. It was
legislation conducts an audit of the concernedemphasized to the team that current increased salary
country’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA)/ DGCA tolevels based on the 6th Pay Commission has
ensure its capability for providing safety certificationincreased the attractiveness of Government positions
and continuing oversight on its international carriers. Theand retention has improved. Government has
audit is conducted under an ‘International Aviationapproved and revised about 560 technical positions
Safety Assessment Programme’ (IASA) andand 150 non-technical positions in addition to existing
focuses on the country's ability to adhere to standards160 technical and 177 non-technical positions.
and recommended practices of International CivilAggressive action plan for recruitment is under way.
Aviation Organisation (ICAO) for aircraft operations72 technical officers are being hired in September –
and maintenance.October on short term contract. Higher level of
Under the IASA programme, FAA in the year 1997financial delegation given to the DGCA by
had conducted an audit of DGCA India and hadGovernment of India. DGCA has inturn delegated
awarded Category 1 status to India. This year, in Marchfinancial powers to regional offices. DGCA now has 13
2009, FAA, based on the report of an audit conducteddirectortes as against exiting 9. Four new directorates
by ICAO in October 2006, conducted a reassessmenthave been added. A DGCA wide internal and external
of DGCA. While the FAA’s IASA team found Indiatraining programme has been developed. Further, a big
to be compliant in areas of aviation legislation, operatingproject of IT led solutions in DGCA is in advanced
regulations, civil aviation structure and safety oversightstage of action. DGCA India fulfils all international
functions, and licensing and certification obligations, itstandards regarding Licensing and Certification
raised concerns in the areas of adequate technicalObligations. The DGCA-wide surveillance program
guidance for DGCA inspectors, hiring and retainingwas shared with the team and it was emphasized
technical personnel in DGCA, establishment of anthat all airlines including foreign airlines are included in
on-going surveillance programme of air operators andthe surveillance programme which is under aggressive
the resolution of identified safety issues. DGCA wasimplementation.
required to rectify the concerns in the identified areasThe programme of surveillance includes Indian
in a short time frame of about five months.registered as well as aircraft taken by Indian operators
Repercussions of non-action could have resulted inon wet lease. The current programme for 2009
India being downgraded to Category 2 status from theincludes 4,327 surveillance activities, of which 2545
Category 1, which has been held by India since 1997.have been conducted till August 2009. The system for
Under Category 2, no expansion/ changes to theaddressing deficiencies arising out of the surveillance
services of Indian air carriers would have beenwas discussed. The team was informed of setting up
permitted by USA and the existing operations wouldof Surveillance and Enforcement Division (SMED) and
have been subjected to ‘heightened FAAthe Board for Aviation Safety (BFAS) in headquarters
surveillance’. Such a downgrade would not onlyfor monthly monitoring of identified Level I deficiencies
have resulted to an economic impact to the nation butand progress of other deficiencies. 87 enforcement
would also have been a setback to India’s imageactions have been taken against personnel and
worldwide in ICAO, EU, USA and in the internationaloperators. In addition to the surveillance programme,
aviation community. The FAA IASA team revisitedDGCA has put in a System of Quality Check of
DGCA on 23rd September 2009, to confirm andforeign flying training facilities used by Indian students
validate the action taken on the concerns since thefor obtaining pilot licenses. DGCA officers have
audit in March 2009. The visit was also made torecently conducted an inspection of foreign flying
ascertain the information which were provided to FAAinstitute in Philippines in consultation with their civil
by DGCA from time to time in the previous fewaviation authority. A system of recently introduced
months on the progress made to make good thefinancial surveillance of airlines was also discussed
deficiencies. During the discussions, the FAA teambased on the current economic slowdown and
confirmed the action taken by DGCA to make goodconsequent pressures on the airlines. The revised
the identified concerns of the earlier March 2009 audit.Schedule VI of the Aircraft Rules 1937on Penalties
The team confirmed DGCA meeting the internationalwas shared with the team where substantial increase
standards in the area of aviation law and regulationsin financial penalty for non-adherence to regulations
and confirmed that the powers of Director Generalhas been addressed. DGCA Enforcement Policy and
were well laid down in the various parts of the AircraftProcedures Manual was provided to the team which
Act, 1934 and Aircraft Rules, 1937 and the regulationswas issued on 20 May, 2009 and effective from 15
were available to all users. In the area of CAAJune 2009. The Manual establishes and publicizes
Structure and safety oversight functions, the teaminternal deadlines for taking action, appeal actions, and
acknowledged that lack of financial resources is not amonitoring compliance with enforcement decisions
constraint for DGCA and that there has been anthroughout the regions, and implements an effective
eight-fold increase in the annual budget for DGCA thisinternal staff process to ensure timely action. The
year.DGCA Officers at headquarters and in the regions
In 2009-10, DGCA has 40 crores under Plan and Rshave been trained on the manual. Stakeholders are
22 crores under non-plan. FAA was informed byaware that they are subject to enforcement, and the
DGCA that a feasibility study for establishment of Civilprogram constitutes an effective deterrent. FAA team
Aviation Authority has been commissioned and willwas suitably impressed with the amount of work
commence in October 2009. The FAA team wasaccomplished by DGCA India. FAA stated that
shown the technical guidance, which was prepared incomplete action and correction of concerns raised by
areas of operations, airworthiness and enforcementFAA was done in the available time space which is
for the guidance and use of safety inspectors ofconsidered rare in the history of IASA. FAA also
DGCA for day-to-day functioning including the trainingacknowledged the commitment and support of Ministry
provided to the inspectors on their use.of Civil Aviation and Government of India.
The availability of an increased number of flight