Does Law School Prepare You to Practice Law? Part 1

There's a great deal of criticism lately as to whetherand walk me through everything as if I'd never
law schools should provide an education that betterattended law school, and I definitely felt like I was
prepares students for practice. The Legal Satyriconstarting from close to zero.
says:We do need to remember, though, that the bulk of
"When you learn how to be a doctor, you work onquality litigation training in law school is farmed out to
cadavers until you learn how to work on real people.adjunct professors, as the full time faculty is mainly
When you learn to fly a plane, you spend some time infocused on research and writing, as well as the rather
the simulator. If you want to be a lawyer, you still needamorphously defined skill of teaching students to "think
to attend law school. Unfortunately, most of the legallike lawyers." What I find interesting is that, instead of
academy doesn't think it should stoop to actuallydefending oneself by pointing to the useful litigation
teaching students how to be lawyers."training currently offered, some people seem to think
I actually think that we need to divide the critique intothat no actual practice skills need to be taught at all.
litigation and transactional areas.David Papke noted that "We don't want law school to
As to litigation, I'm not sure it's fair to say that lawbe lawyer-training school." And PrawfsBlog notes that
schools do a poor job of training law students. Mostthe entire law professor profession is biased against
law schools have elaborate moot court programs,practice, such that having substantial legal experience
offer trial practice and have litigation focused legalcan prevent one from being an attractive candidate in
writing classes. Perhaps they could focus more onthe professor hiring market, saying that the "division
document review skills (though that would be mightybetween academia and practice seems as great as it
boring) or, better yet, motion practice and depositionhas ever been."
training as well. Nevertheless, when I graduated fromWhat I find most interesting about this yawning divide
law school and clerked for a judge in a trial court, Ibetween academia and practice, is that, for the life of
was definitely not lost and found the proceedingsme, I can't understand why this needs to be the case.
approachable. But I did find that learning state rules ofIf you are a professor focused on the empirical legal
procedure, amassing necessary forms, and, obviously,studies movement, why can't you teach actual
learning substantive law to be the areas I needed topractice skills in the context of your research? If you
improve upon. Perhaps these skills could be added towrite about discourse analysis, why can't you analyze
law school litigation training.a contract negotiation? If you are an economics and
However, I ended up practicing as a transactionalthe law scholar, why can't you instruct students on the
attorney, and I could not have been less prepared. Ieconomic administration of law firms and explore the
was surprised to discover that the vast majority of anature of perverse incentives?
1L contracts course does not help you much in draftingIt seems to me that, as a profession, we can bridge
and negotiating deals. Senior attorneys had to sit downthis chasm.