Keyword Ownership: What It Is And Where It's Headed

Have you ever got one of those silly emails that offersMicrosoft. Therefore everyone who used IE
to let you own a keyword? Silly question. How manyautomatically had the plugin.The Legal QuestionEach of
such emails do you get every day?A number of suchthe companies offering these services has a policy
services regularly email me offering keyworddesigned to ensure that a web site only buys
ownership of premium keywords for $300/year. Theykeywords related to their content, and their review
say that anyone can type the keyword I bought in theprocess is designed to keep cybersquatters from
address bar of Internet explorer, instead of typing in ahijacking popular names and products. Unfortunately,
URL, and they will be sent directly to my site. In total itthere is no way to guarantee that any one of these
seems that there are about 2% of Internet userskeyword ownership services adheres to any naming
worldwide who have enabled one type or another ofstandard, or even ensures that any purchaser has the
this system, spread out between a few competitivelegal right to any of the terms they are buying. This
services.Data shows that between 4% and 7% ofmeans that the rights to copyrighted material like
search queries are performed by entering something in"Pepsi" or generic words like "business" could end up in
the address bar. By default for IE users, thesethe hands of the first buyer. While Pepsi is a well
searches are automatically routed through to MSNknown brand name, there are millions of copyrighted
search. Many of us however have installed so muchand trademark protected terms, covered in multiple
software over time, and unknowingly, some of thisjurisdictions. It would not be cost effective or practical
software has re-routed these search queries to otherfor these services to police copyright and trademark
search portals, such as iGetNet, or others. This ofteninfringement.In the summer of 1999, the U.S. Court of
happens if you've installed any file sharing software.Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, denied Playboy's request
We have all heard / read about how many extrafor an injunction barring a search engine from selling
'features' come with programs like Kazaa. This meansadvertising based on the terms playboy and playmate.
that your default search from the address bar may noIn the precedent setting ruling regarding keyword
longer be MSN, and may have been reroutedadvertising, Judge Stotler of the United States District
elsewhere, but the basic principle still applies. Of theCourt in Santa, Ana, California, dismissed a lawsuit
queries that are actually run from an address bar, atbrought by Playboy Enterprises against the search
least half of them are unintentionally instigated byengine Excite, Inc. and Netscape. The ruling limited the
people mistyping the desired URL. This means thatonline rights of trademark holders, as it recognized that
between 2% and 4% of Internet users actually searcha trademark may be used without authorization by
via their address bar.So how exactly do thesesearch engines in advertising sales practices.Playboy
address bars work? There are many of theseclaimed that the search engines were displaying paid
companies offering this kind of service, with each onebanner ads from pornographic web sites whenever
of them selling the very same keywords to different"playboy" or "playmate" were used as a search term.
and sometimes competing companies. To make thingsAs the owner of the trademarks for both terms,
worse, the keywords you might buy will only work withPlayboy argued that the use of its trademarks for a
the issuing companys proprietary address bar plug-in.third party sales scheme was trademark infringement
Then, to actually offer search capabilities from theand branding dilution.In the ruling dismissing Playboy's
address bar, each of these service providers needs tocase, the Judge found that Excite had not used the
get individual Internet users to download and install theirtrademarks "playboy" and "playmate" in an unlawful
plug-in, and remember to run searches from themanner. This was because Excite had not used the
address bar.How effective can a marketing strategytrademarked words to identify Excites own goods or
of this nature be when the various tools are notservices and therefore trademark infringement laws
interchangeable, there are numerous competitorsdid not apply. It was further determined that even if
selling the same key words to different companies,there was trademark usage, there was no
and you are targeting only a small fraction of Internetinfringement because there was no evidence that
users? If your ad is being displayed because its similarconsumers confused Playboy products with the
to the search query, are you paying for irrelevantservices of Excite or Netscape.What about within
results? This can happen; If there is not a perfectMeta Tags?Is it illegal to use trademarked terms in
match to a search query, the next closest match mayyour meta tags? Sometimes. The problem occurs with
be displayed.Competing with these companies is anyhow and why you are using the terms. Web sites that
search engine that offers its own toolbar. You canuse the tags in a deceptive manner have lost legal
download a toolbar from any number of engines, andbattles. However, legitimate reasons to use the terms
run searches on any key word or phrase quickly andhave resulted in successful defenses.In a case
easily. You then get the search engines selection ofinvolving Playboy, the firm was able to prove
closest matches, from all the web sites they havetrademark infringement, based on use of their
indexed. They offer more than just one choice, andtrademark in meta tags, url and content on the web
dont cost anythingWho Started This?Started in 1998,site. The case was filed by the firm against web site
Realnames was the first company that tied searchingoperators for stuffing their web pages with the words
via the address bar to a web browser. At the time, itPlayboyand Playmatehundreds of times. Furthermore,
was touted as a value added solution for businessesthe defendants were also using the terms Playboy
around the world who were attempting to get theirand Playmate in the site names, URLs, and slogans. In
products found quickly, but didn't want customers tothis case the Judge ruled for Playboy, as there was a
have to wade through a sea of Web addresses toclear case of trademark infringement.In the separate
reach their destination.In part, it was deemedcase, Playboy vs. Terri Welles, the court refused
necessary because so few web site operators werePlayboy's request. The reason was simple. Terri
search engine savvy, and fewer still knew anythingWelles was Playboy's 1981 Playmate of the Year. She
about search engine optimization and promotion. Whathad used the terms "Playmate" and "Playboy" on her
the Realnames solution did was allow a web siteweb pages and within her meta tags, and the Court
operator to buy a keyword, and then when any userfelt she had a legitimate right to use them to
of Internet Explorer would type that keyword into theaccurately describe herself, and to ensure that the
IE address toolbar, they would get directed to the websearch engines could catalog her web site properly
site that owned the keyword.The company hoped towithin their databases. Playboy's appeal was dismissed
profit from businesses which wanted to reach Interneton Feb. 1, 2002.In SummaryIt is clear that if you have a
users who would type keywords into their browserslegitimate reason to use a trademarked word or
address bar instead of remembering the url, or goingphrase in your web site you can. You may also rent
through a standard search interface.Unfortunately fortheir ownership from one of the keyword ownership
the company, the service was entirely dependent oncompanies. Be careful, though, it is possible that may
Microsoft; and when Microsoft stopped supporting theget sued.Does the technology work? Yes, but only for
technology in May 2002, the company was forced tosome of the approximately 3% of Internet users
close. The reason it was so totally dependent wasworldwide who have installed any one of a variety of
simple; Unlike the new companies on the market today,competing plugins that enable this type of searching. I
Realnames did not depend on an end userstress a fraction of the 3%, as you would need to buy
downloading and installing a plugin, instead it wasthe keywords from each individual vendor to ensure
essentially integrated into Internet Explorer byreaching all 2%.